You are here

Are these rules crazy?

surprisestepmother's picture

I've been working on some ground rules for this mess, and I think I have some solid starters. Do you think these rules are unreasonable, and what do you think should be added?

General Rules.

1. I cannot be held to any custody agreement they have whatsoever. I am not responsible for pick-ups, contact, or asking permission for anything. 

1a. If he's denied permission for anything, like my family's July 4th gathering because it is held at a family owned nudist campground) he is responsible for making sure he's still there. I am not a single mother. 

2. I do not have to hear anything about this woman's opinion of me, and I can act freely. I will not be changing the way I breastfeed or anything to do with my bios care (ie. If I want to have more kids and I want a homebirth, I am allowed to do so without her input, regardless of what SD might see). 

2a. This doesn't change my family options. SD's existence is not allowed to affect if I can have more children, or anything else that having a child outside of our marriage might affect in family decision making.

3. I do not have to contact this woman or hear from her for any reason. If there is an emergency, I contact my husband first, and he contacts this woman. Her number will be blocked in my phone.

4. The phone to contact BM for SD calls and emergencies will be a burner phone with no text capabilities. All formal contact will be through email. 

5. Pick-ups stay public, and she is not allowed in my house. If I see her there, I WILL assume she is breaking in and I will call the police. 

6. I realize that I will probably have to watch her more than a typical schedule because I'm not working right now and my husband works weird hours, however, I am not responsible for schoolwork or more than basic care. My child is my priority, and I WILL NOT put them second!

 

Rules specifically for SD:

1. SD cannot call me by my first name or a casual nickname. She can call me Aunt [first name], Ms. [first name], or Mom/Mama [first name tacked on or not]. 

2. Cellphones from her biological mother's will be confiscated until she goes back. We will give her a phone for our time when she is in middle school, just like our biological kids. 

3. Any pictures she gets will have both me and my husband in them, and she can not take back any pictures of my biological kid(s). 

 

Comments

BethAnne's picture

Sounds like good rules to me. Personally though I would not want BM to have pictures of me at her house and would let SD take pictures of just her dad (or her dad and herself). 

beebeel's picture

Well, I wouldn't give "rules" to my husband. I would call them "boundaries." Wink

I only have issues with one of these and it's because I'm not sure why you don't want to be called by your name. You are not her aunt. You are not her mom or mama. My skids called me by my first name and it never once meant that they didn't have to respect me.

surprisestepmother's picture

Yeah boundaries would probably be a better word, I just had the word rules stuck in my head because it was mostly geared towards the kid at first. 

I grew up in a culture where children did NOT call adults by first name, ever. If they had adult cousins they were even called Cousin [first name]. Stepparents, when there were any, were called Aunt/Uncle, Ms./Mr., or Mom/Dad. It would have been considered extremely disrespectful otherwise. I think Ms. [first name] is perfectly fine, however if that's too formal, I wanted to present all the options. 

beebeel's picture

Ok, but what culture do you live in now, with SD? Would her friends and family be confused and put-off when they hear her call you "Aunt Sue" or whatever? I have never heard of a stepkid calling their step mom "aunt." And most women would have a problem with their kid calling another woman "mom or mama anything." Would that request send the bm off the deepend? 

You are the one whose SD showed up out of the blue at 6 years old, right? I don't think starting off extremely formal is the right approach. 

surprisestepmother's picture

It's still pretty southern, so probably not. Also even in cases of foster care, kids called their foster parents uncle and aunt.

simifan's picture

I had a step grandfather. We kids called him Uncle Frank. He was a fantanstic guy, treated my Grandmother like gold. As an adult,  I think of the implications and EWWWW. Grandmomma and Uncle Frank married etc.?!?! 

ProbablyAlreadyInsane's picture

look. I'm all fro rules and boundaries. But i think you're going a bit too far with a few things.

Especially since text messaging (as long as you trust your hubby) is better than phone calls when it comes to keeping records. And maybe SD will want to be close to her siblings and misses them when she's gone.  What do you think she's going to do with a picture of your bios???

I agree with a lot of your other stuff, but I thnk take a moment to breathe and really think about what matters to you and what is or is not important in this scenerio.

Obviously BM has no say in your household, and obviously she shouldn't be at your place. Once SD hits highschool, if she chooses spots and stuff (or has friends), it's going to be hard for there to be 2 cellphones and 2 numbers hanging around.

One thing to remember... SD didn't pick this anymore than you did.  SD didn't pick her parents, and I doubt she chose for her BM to track down your DH. SD is a child, and until she starts acting out maliciously against you or your bios (which has happened, but isn't 100%) she's a child of your DH.  Don't treat her like an outsider just becuase she was unplanned.  She's probably just as lost in all this as you are.

justmakingthebest's picture

Think if you present these to your husband you are probably looking for trouble to be honest. I do 100% agree that you should have boundaries in place but in family and in marriage things eb and flow. Being rigid will only leave you hurt. 

For example, if his parenting time falls during a time where you are at your families nudest thing- and SD can't go- then he needs to take care of his daughter. You can either go without him or you can stay home too. I believe that you have to prioritize your marriage as being first but your children are your first responsibility. He has to take care of her. 

That being said, you are not the babysitter. I think that he should find a daycare for her if he is not going to be home. Yes that will cost you more money but his child shouldn't be treated as a 2nd class citizen either. 

I am very southern and my kids called my husband Mr. ____ until we got married. Now they refer to him as <firstname>. I was Ms. JMTB for a while too, then it naturally went away. There comes a point where it is ok to let the formality leave, you may not be there yet, but once again being rigid and distant to her is really going to leave out and you hurt. No decent father would stand for it. 

You husband seems like a good man who is trying to make you as comfortable as possible in this. He was as blindsided by this woman as you were. Trust him to do the right thing, to take care of you and respect you. But if you keep pushing this child away and punishing her, you may be the one left behind. This isn't her fault. Her mom sucks, but that is all and she didn't get to choose her parents. 

 

surprisestepmother's picture

I'm not trying to punish her. I'm just trying to start out right. I'd rather start with too many rules and ease up when they're not needed than have too few and have to try unsuccessfully to tighten up later, when I've already allowed too much.

I also need to protect mine and my children's interests. I've seen too many stories on here about women denied bio children (or more bio children) based on stepkids, and I'm not letting that happen to me. 

 

Daycare isn't an option here. It's shut down unless you have no other option (ie. both parents are essential). Our situation wouldn't qualify.

justmakingthebest's picture

Take a step back. Logic through this with me after you take a deep breath.

If you and your husband don't make it. If this leads to your divorce and he marries again: How would you feel and how would your children feel if this is how their new SM regulated? 

Probably not very good. I have a feeling that you would not tolerate this from a SM. That if this is how she wanted to treat your kids, your kids feelings would be hurt and you would hurt for them to be an outsider in their own family. Like it or not, your husband and child are this little girls biological family. 

surprisestepmother's picture

I'm fine with that. However, that does not give the biological mother power over me, my household, or my behavior.

justmakingthebest's picture

No it does not give BM any power in your home, I agree with that. Your house, your rules. 

I would just relax your expectations a bit and go with the flow for a while. Try to make SD feel more at home and a part of the family. 

As for the breastfeeding/cover up situation- like I said before, there is nothing wrong with asking SD to go play in her room for a little bit so that the baby can eat if you are in the main part of the house. There is also nothing wrong with you going into the baby's room and sitting in a rocking chair in there nursing.

surprisestepmother's picture

I refuse to hide or be ashamed. I am NOT a typical stepmother or some kind of mistress. I didn't choose this or "know what I'm getting into". 

I don't have the power to leave unless abandoning my biological child is considered reasonable.

justmakingthebest's picture

Trust and believe that no one on this site "Knew what they were getting into" LOL

I understand you not wanting to be typical but if you keep throwing up walls and not be willing to try to open you home and heart- you are going to be the only one hurt. Plus, there is no typical SM. We are all out here doing to best we can. But most of us make those step kids a priority. They might frustrate, their mom's might drive us to the brink of insanity- but they are part of our spouse and we love our spouse and support our spouses. 

You haven't mentioned anything about this little girl that leads anyone to believe she is a holy terror that is destroying your home, trying to harm your baby or causing fights between you and your husband because he is unsupportive of you. -- those things happen to a lot of members here. What you are faced with is a life choice by someone outside your marriage that is now affecting you. That sucks. Period. But you have to realize that you can do this and be all in without keeping SD as an outsider. You and your husband just have to be a team.

surprisestepmother's picture

It's not the child. It's her mother. If I could guarantee that her mother would stay out of my household and my life without these guidelines I wouldn't have them. Unfortunately that's not the case, so I need to protect myself.

ProbablyAlreadyInsane's picture

You're the same as everyone in the sense that your DH has a child, whether he knew about her or not.

You're a stepparent, even if it's completley unexpected.

surprisestepmother's picture

I wasn't trying to offend anyone, but I would think it's different when you know going in (and before having bios!) versus getting shocked by it years after getting married while recovering from childbirth.

ProbablyAlreadyInsane's picture

I'm not taking offense at all Smile I'm just saying, chose it or not, aware or not, you're a stepparent now.

It was a solid s*** show. lmao. But what I am saying is. Sure you weren't aware, but the role's still going to be the same for you (relatively, all the situations are a bit different) from here on out Smile

ESMOD's picture

I have comments with each of the rules... as a step parent you are not obligated to accomodate or pay for his child.. he is.

and.. I'm sure this is a shock... but the child is 6 years old.. and she is your child's sister... and she didn't ask for these adults to creat this crazy situation.  A little more empathy and warmth might be in order for her... she didnt make this happen.  If you can't watch her without losing your cool... your husband needs to find alternate childcare.

General Rules.

1. I cannot be held to any custody agreement they have whatsoever. I am not responsible for pick-ups, contact, or asking permission for anything. 

Sure, this is his child and he is the one that must adhere to his custody order.  You are not required to pay for his child.. or babysit his child etc... You shouldn't interfere with his ability to participate as her parent.. and shouldn't prevent him from meeting his obligations as her parent.  but You. personally.. do not have to facilitate anything.

1a. If he's denied permission for anything, like my family's July 4th gathering because it is held at a family owned nudist campground) he is responsible for making sure he's still there. I am not a single mother. 

This you may lose on... if her mother will not allow her to go to this type of resort (I know not a den of sin.. but if she objects to the nudity).. I think it's likely her mother can make that call.. and if 4th of july falls on his custody time.. he may need to not take her.. so you may have to accept that if you will do nothing to accomodate her existance.. he may do things without you so that he can meet HIS obligations to her.. which will in all likelihood be much smaller in scope than those to you.. so you are still winning.

2. I do not have to hear anything about this woman's opinion of me, and I can act freely. I will not be changing the way I breastfeed or anything to do with my bios care (ie. If I want to have more kids and I want a homebirth, I am allowed to do so without her input, regardless of what SD might see). 

It's none of her business how you run your home really... except when you directly interact with her child and you cannot do that in an abusive way.

2a. This doesn't change my family options. SD's existence is not allowed to affect if I can have more children, or anything else that having a child outside of our marriage might affect in family decision making.

In theory.. yes.. in reality.. her existance is a financial obligation for your husband.. it may limit resources.. so decisions to have kids.. may at some point be impacted... you don't have the right to dictate what he does with his resources with no input from him.  certainly his family.. his ex don't get to be part of this decision.. but you also don't have unilateral rights to dictate this... he should have input too.

3. I do not have to contact this woman or hear from her for any reason. If there is an emergency, I contact my husband first, and he contacts this woman. Her number will be blocked in my phone.

Since you are not going to participate in drop offs etc.. no real reason for you to ever need to contact her or vice versa.

4. The phone to contact BM for SD calls and emergencies will be a burner phone with no text capabilities. All formal contact will be through email. 

Maybe use the my family wizard program.... it may accomplish what you want.  obv for emergencies they should have the ability to reach each other.

5. Pick-ups stay public, and she is not allowed in my house. If I see her there, I WILL assume she is breaking in and I will call the police. 

BM should not need to be in your home.

6. I realize that I will probably have to watch her more than a typical schedule because I'm not working right now and my husband works weird hours, however, I am not responsible for schoolwork or more than basic care. My child is my priority, and I WILL NOT put them second!

In the short term that should work fine.. in the longer term.. maybe think about going back to work.. then your husband may have resources freed up (now paying your portion of bills) to hire childcare so you won't have to do any childcare period.

 

Rules specifically for SD:

1. SD cannot call me by my first name or a casual nickname. She can call me Aunt [first name], Ms. [first name], or Mom/Mama [first name tacked on or not]. 

2. Cellphones from her biological mother's will be confiscated until she goes back. We will give her a phone for our time when she is in middle school, just like our biological kids. 

a 6 yo shouldn't need to have a cell phone.. if you go with the burner phone option.... they can use that to make calls to mommy if they are stipulated in the Custody order.  her phone can stay with mom.

3. Any pictures she gets will have both me and my husband in them, and she can not take back any pictures of my biological kid(s). 

I don't agree with the first part of this...  you spend pretty much the entirety of this post stipulating how she will not be a "full member" child of your household.. and have zero to do with you etc... then you want her to include Ms..XXX in all her pictures. why.?  makes no sense other than you want to have her take pics back to rub in mom's face somehow.  I can see that you would prefer for BM to not have access to pics of your child (or children in the future).. but they are siblings to your daughter.. as they get older.. they may end up being close and this rule may be difficult to enforce.

surprisestepmother's picture

The only things I don't agree with are 2 and 6, the others are fair and I'm taking it into account. 

2. 

I would never be abusive to her! This is mostly about me being able to do things like breastfeeding the way that works best and possibly homebirth, regardless of what SD may see, as well as things like diet (I will be making all kids eat what they're served, and it's important to me to have a healthy diet for them) and a reasonable bedtime.

 

6. 

This was mostly about not letting this dictate to me if I can have more bio kids or save for their college, like so many stepmothers have dictated to them. I don't believe I should roll over and accept that my baby has to be my only bio, and I will not be. 

As to going back to work, right now it isn't an option. My industry (event planner) is literally shut down. I can't get a job anywhere not retail, and even if I could, daycare currently isn't an option, nor would it financially make sense. We've discussed trying for a second now, and keeping me as a SAHM because things won't be opening back up any time soon anyway. 

ESMOD's picture

Re 2... i did not mean to imply you have or would be abusive.. but that would be the "only" reason for her to have some input on how you do things in your home.

Re 6.... again.. there is no reason why you should have to limit saving for your child.. but your husband does have two children now.. it sounds like he is the only one bringing money in.. so if it comes to a point where he cannot financially afford more than the two children you currently have? or has to split his allotment of college savings three ways and so each child gets relatively less.. that is not unfair.  If you start working ... your income would go towards the household bills proportionate to YOUR kids and yourself  and you would only have to contribute to your own bio kid's savings plans etc..  I'm just pointing out that there could be a finite limit on resources in your household at some point.. and he should have the ability to support all his kids.. not short the first one due to her circumstances.. but he should also not short your kid (s) in any worse way.. all of his kids will be sharing his resources.. equitably. (obviously.. she has a mother too.. so her mom is responsible for 1/2 of her college etc...).    

surprisestepmother's picture

That makes the difference. She might view my lifestyle as abusive when it's not, and in that case she needs to call CPS (who would clear me bc my activities are legal) and not bother me otherwise.

ProbablyAlreadyInsane's picture

Be SUPER careful with CPS. They've bit people in the a$$ before, doing things legally or not.

ESMOD's picture

I think someone on here was in a situation with them because they claimed that the social worker told them how to correctly hit their child... and they were under a lot of scrutiny....  The best thing to do is let her husband do the parenting and discipline so that there is no way she can be construed as being abusive.  If there is no choice but that she must help take care of the child.. she probably still leave all discipline and counseling of the child to her husband... sure.. if it absolutely necessary to tell the child to stop doing something or simply send them to their room..firmly and calmly.. they can wait for dad to lay it on them when he gets home.

Ursula's picture

Some of these are a little over the top.  For example, why can't SD have a pic of just herself and her dad?  Why do you have to be in all of them?

Also, the 4th of July example.  Not sure if BM would have the final call on that, but if it's his parenting time and SD cannot attend, then he would have to stay back with her.  He's a parent to her just as much as he is to your bio.  You could all stay back and do your own 4th of July thing. 

surprisestepmother's picture

I have rethought the picture thing based on other feedback. 

As to July 4th, my family celebrates there together every year. I'm NOT missing it and neither will.y children. If my husband chooses to abandon us, I'll be humiliated but that's his choice.

BethAnne's picture

Sadly doing things without your husband is normal for step parents. Don't be humiliated by it, it is normal - no one will judge you for it. That doesn't mean he should always choose time with his other daughter over time with you and your kids but inevitably it will happen sometimes. 

justmakingthebest's picture

He wouldn't be abandoning you, he would be being a parent to his child. You have to learn the difference for your sanity. 

ESMOD's picture

If he is NCP, then he is not oblligated to actually take time that is his... but honestly, I think parents should take all the time they have.. BUT... in this case.. it seems that if the 4th is an important thing to OP and if it is always at this resort.. maybe he needs to have that mom will have her on every 4th... and he can have some other holiday on a regular basis.. one that doesn't normally include that campground?

tog redux's picture

Yikes, this sucks for you.

I'd suggest rather than "rules", you sit down with your husband and express your concerns about BM's intrusion into your home and the fact that you want more children and are not willing to have that disrupted. Then address other concerns as they come up. Marriage counseling might help a lot. 

I'd also suggest that you get a job of some kind (when you can) so that you are ARE able to leave if you need to leave the situation.

 

shamds's picture

married couples often go to separate events.

there are plenty of inlaw events i do not go to such as birthday parties, engagements or wedding ceremonies and receptions because 1 of my kids isn’t feeling well, we are about to fly overseas for a holiday or i am exhausted with university studies etc. These are inlaws i am very close and friendly with too. 

I do not lay down an ultimatum that hubby attends blah blah blah or neither does my husband lay down an ultimatum “i am not a single man and you will come!!” 

My husband is a senior vp in the finance industry and really high up, he goes to plenty of events that spouses attend but he is comfortable with me staying at home and he tries to get those events done asap sp he can get home quickly  and these are often every month or 2.

also i am part asian and its very disrespectful to call your stepparent by a first name. You acknowledge their title, stepmum or stepdad... my ss who was 20 at the time told his dad i was a stranger and thats why he won’t acknowledge me and pretend i and my 2 kids with hubby, do not exist. Ss lives in our marital home. My husband was furious and told him that i was not a stranger and a mother to 2 of his kids...

part of being in a marriage or committed relationship is that you need to compromise. You agree to disagree and compromise. Don’t be too rigid in things and control everything.

so your family are doing a 4th july celebration, woopdidoo.. we don’t celebrate that in australia (where i am from), you wanna go then so be it. 

But your husband has every right to support the bio mums concerns that sd is not brought there as this is a serious boundary issue of bio mum if she is a more modest woman who doesn’t see nudist camps as natual or normal like you do. Where i am from there is no such thing as a nudist camp and you would get arrested for parading nude in public or even private camp grounds if its something tge public can attend. You don’t have the right to force your partner bring sd because your ego as a mother can’t handle him not being there. To be honest i would be mortified seeing a crapload of nude people running around as an under 10 yr old kid because i was not exposed to that as normal, i did not grow up in a country that saw this as normal and it was very illegal where i am from. So i can empathise with bio mum not being at all comfortable for sd to be made to attend this... 

There is alot of resentment here you are projecting on sd as such an inconvenience and bio mum being controlling. She exists, you are with your partner and whether you like it or not sd exists for the rest of her life... 

Rumplestiltskin's picture

I just want to say i am so very sorry for what you are going through. You married your husband and have a new baby, and now, during what is a very emotional and stressful time (new motherhood), you had the bombshell of the SD as well as the fact that your husband is going for near half custody. I have heard of situations where a previous one-night stand came forward in such a way, but in the case of my friend, the husband did not seek as much custody. The husband paid child support, and saw the child on holidays and summers, but since the child had gone through years without him already they didn't jump to a schedule that disrupted everyone's life so drastically. Half (or near half) joint custody is probably the most disruptive you can get, amd it involves not only accepting the child but accepting the mother, a brief fling of your husband that you probably never heard of before, in your life on a very regular and permanent basis. That's a very tough pill to swallow.

A lot of people are judging you and saying you are being too harsh. I don't know where your husband is in all this, but if he is making major decisions on this without your input, your feeings may be justified.

I would suggest that you need to be a part of making the custody schedule from the outset. My ex husband's family celebrates Christmas on Christmas Eve, so it's in the CO that the kids are always with him on that day. Maybe you guys can work that into your CO, that the child is always with her mother on the 4th. You were married to your husband when this bombshell dropped. You two should be a unit when making decisions about your home. There is no precedent of him having a coparenting relationship with her that doesn't involve you. If he respects this, maybe you will not feel so defensive regarding the child and the mother.

As far as what she calls you, i know some people have strong opinions on this. My SO comes from a culture where this is a big deal. I don't. My kids and nieces and nephews call him Mr. ****. It matters to him and nobody is hurt by respecting this.

As far as the photos and cell phone, idk. It seems a little early to worry about those things, but i'm not you. I just think that if your husband and you act as a unit when making decisions and you are included, things may go more smoothly. Couples counseling will definitely help as well as individual. If that happened to me i would probably be angry at my DH for being so irresponsible as to have a kid and not know for so long, and angry at the BM for just showing up and dropping this at your doorstep. That poor child, too, has to have her life turned completely upside down due to the irresponsibility of her parents. In this situation, the person most like you as far as responsibility and being forced to change, is her. You share a lot in common, as both of you are casualties of her parents actions. 

Thumper's picture

Your boundaries for the most part sound fairly normal. Instinctively (as all of us humans are) you want to protect, guard the family.

It's human nature....it is the way it is. The family you believed you have, now, has someone from outside the clan.

1. burner phone is fine and should not be any problem in court.  However, a Judge may suggest email contact too. So be ready for that.

2. Pick UP and drops, in public place--reasonable.

3. What should a child call you....by your first name OR here in the south, often times it is Miss so and so or Mr so and so.  Aunt,,you are not an aunt so do not name yourself as Aunt Blah blah.

4. About visitation when your husband is not at home...hmmmm, no. He should be there.  Visitation is between parent and bio child. Not child and step parent. Some times...ok, dad will be home in 30mins. That is different.

When he can not adjust his work schedule he will need to 1. change work hours or 2. change visitation.

5. Lets chat nudist camps and bf'ing. Plan your mini vacations around visitation. Poof problem solved. About Breast Feeding---My kids were bf until their first birthday..  I never wanted my skids or anyone else for that matter to see my boobs.  Dad will have to figure out how to distract his older child during feeding time.

6. totally agree with the cell phone thing. We did not allow it either.

7. Photos...you decision I guess. I would not want photos of me taken to bm. Totally agree with no pictures of your bio child.

Boundaries---a better word. Not rules.

Knowing what I know---I find it unusual the courts where you are just said HERE...here is visitation and here are overnights your childs name is XYZ.. Mr. Dad.

How is your step child doing???

Hang in there.

 

 

dessy101's picture

I think you need to take a step back and breathe. You need to come to terms with the fact that your DH has another child and that will NOT change. To your DH that child is equal to your child together and as such should be treated by him as such. I haven't seen from your post that this child is problematic so I am going off that when I say that she deserves to be love and accepted by family. She is your DH's family. If you push too hard you may end up losing your DH or have a SD that is very resentful and bitter when she may have otherwise been a problem, free kid. (I am not saying the latter is a definite but you should be kind to her until a situation arise) Just think futuristically for a second, if you are hostile to her from the outset, when she is hostile it will be because you don't like her. Your DH will know your ill feelings and it will backfire. However, if you are kind and she becomes hostile, you can always say you tried.

You have to accept that the life you thought you were going to have with your DH has changed. Perhaps some counselling can help you to accept that. But, if it is something you cannot live with walk away. You mentioned previously that you are afraid that you will lose custody. That is NOT true. Do not let untruths keep you in an unhappy situation. As a breastfeeding mom, the best interest of the child is to be with you. But, I will advise that you perhaps rethink having yet another child right now until you have resolve the issue of is this the life I want to have. Don't make life harder on you to leave if you choose to, by having another child. Give yourself room for independence, by getting a job as well. Perhaps, when you see a future where you are self-supporting you may have a clearer vision for your life. 

I strongly advise that you insist that this child be in day-care whenever her father is not around. Especially, when you start unpacking your emotions because this child deserves to be respect and kindness. Perhaps with greater introspection you may realise what is driving this need to be in control and to be rigid.

Be honest with DH about your expectations but also be open-minded. Don't let short term gains cost you long term aims. One day, your SD will have her own life and a lot of the rules above will not matter. So think more long term. Remember it’s not about winning the battle but winning the war. And the war is the marriage!

susanm's picture

If you don't mind my "bottom lining it", it sounds like you really need to deal with the underlying issue rather than distracting yourself with the details.  At the heart of this is that you are PISSED at your husband and want to rip his head clean off.  You were living your life exactly as you wanted and along came the Ghost of One-Night Stands Past and screwed everything up essentially forever.  You will never get away from this girl even if you were to get divorced because your child is this kid's sibling and will be raised with her for at least some of the time and will have to share whatever resources your husband brings in.

Somehow you are going to have to find a way to process your anger before it eats you alive.  All of these rules and trying to control how things will work are simply a way to cope with the fury that you have not yet been able to fully deal with.  You may need to consult a therapist on your own for a while and then bring your husband in.  Or maybe take some time away by yourself with your baby and let him deal with his new daughter. 

This is his past coming back to haunt him and he needs to step up and deal with it and that includes your very reasonable anger.  How would he feel if suddenly the police turned up on your doorstep with a warrant for your arrest for a minor crime you had committed a decade ago that you thought was long resolved but you had been considered a "fugitive" all this time and now you were in serious trouble?  Or the IRS came calling for back taxes that you had neglected to pay and suddenly your joint finances were thrown into chaos due to the interest?   He would not be all "that's OK honey - I love you so much - no biggie!!!"  That is not how normal people react when their world is turned on its head.  I have a feeling that you would be much more relaxed about this if you were able to work through your shock and anger and get some resolution.

CompletelyPuzzled's picture

I just wonder OP how you will handle the issues if this BM turns out to be HC?  You can set all the rules you want, but she will find ways.  She can drag your DH back to court over and over again, causing financial and emotional turmoil.  She can call CPS on you over and over again.  This will definitely cause upheaval.  She can also attempt to alienate this child and use her to cause problems in your home and marriage.

 

You can set all the rules you want for your DH, but you are going to have a tough time making BM follow them.  You are probably going to pi$$ off BM.  You may not care now, but she may make you pay for it later.  She has nothing to lose.  She has raised this child alone for six years.  You, on the other hand, have alot to lose.  According to you, you would lose custody if you were to divorce.  That puts you in a vulnerable position.   As a SM who has.dealt with crazy, my advice is to be open to the fact that this is probably not going to be smooth sailing.

shamds's picture

Is compromise. You compromise with time, family events, and alot of other things... 

op trying to control things, trying to control sd’s relationship with her, her visits with her dad etc will eventually turn you into a hcgubm... seriously just don’t go there hun... because for those of us living a life with our partners exwives or ex partners who are hcgubm, its a horrible life, it never ends and you just disengage.

if being a stepmum was something you never ever wanted the risk of, checking into your husband or partners lifestyle pre-you being in the picture is so important. Just taking their word on things which leads to surprises and now you mad as heck, resentful and just going overboard controlling him.

i say this from experience, for those of us with partners who have crazy high conflict exwives, the last thing they need or want is their current partner pulling the same crazy shi#!!

BethAnne's picture

I read this list differently to most here.

I see it as pretty much what we advocate most of the time anyway. Limiting SM-BM contact, limiting the affect that BM can have on our homes, drawing lines about what we are and are not willing to do to help our partners and expecting step kids to fit in with our lives and show us basic respect. If half of the relationships we read about on here had started with some clear boundaries then most of the issues would be delt with straight away rather than years later step parents turning around and resenting the influence of the BM in their lives, resenting the parental expectations of partners and fed up of the disrsepect from their step kids 

Of course life and court orders and difficult BM's may mean that some things will have to change and compromises be made, but starting with a good base of expectations is better than walking blindly into the many traps of step parenthood.