Emotionally blackmailed by SS, help!
I have SS13 who visits us 2-3 weekends a month or DH goes to his town and visits him. The problem is with how SS emotionally blackmails DH into doing whatever he wants. My ex-husband lives across the country and only gets my kids for half of every summer. He pays CS so I don’t depend on DH to pay for my kids in any way.
However, until recently, DH was bonding very well with DS12 and DD11. They call him Dad and DH even coaches DS’s soccer team.
When we first got married two years ago, everything was great with SS. But that was when we lived in same town as him and we had him every other week. Then we moved 8 months ago because of my work to the next town, 1.5 hour away. SS was not happy about it but it meant more money and better workplace for me.
And ever since the move SS comes here with big attitude towards my kids and me. Always refers to DH as “MY dad”, always clinging to him. He always wants to do things alone with DH. I was ok with that initially. He sees DH less and probably misses him. He is also very mean to my kids now and always fights with them. He also ignores anything I tell him, despite DH trying to correct him for it.
His behavior is just bratty now. He demands that DH drive to all of his games even on weekdays. And poor DH does it because he does not want to upset SS. On Christmas he compared every thing with my kids and pouted when DS got one extra gift then him. And DH ran out to buy him the same thing so he wouldn’t feel left out.
And the day after Christmas DH got a golden retriever puppy for the kids as a family present. SS had a complete tantrum like a 5 year old. He was yelling and crying saying that he asked for a dog his whole life but DH got his new family a dog instead. It was a complete mess. Instead of it being a big happy surprise SS spent the rest of the day in his room while DH tried to pacify him. Everyone was miserable that day. I was really disappointed about it to be perfectly honest. Even the video we hoped to cherish just has SS’s crying and yelling in it.
Ever since then DH has become more distant with my own kids. He also refuses to interact with the puppy unless SS is here. And everytime SS is here the kids argue about who gets to play with the dog.
Last week DH tells DS he can’t coach his team anymore because he has too much work on those days. DS was crushed. DH’s excuse felt very suspicious to me but I just comforted DS and kept quiet. Two days ago DH left his phone unlocked and there were 8 new messages from SS. I thought it might be urgent but when I read them I saw that SS has been ordering DH to stop spending so much time with my kids since January.
He told (yes told) DH that he could not play with DS or DD or the puppy unless he was there too. And he said DH could not be DS’s coach anymore. I could see DH trying to reason with him but SS was saying that DH forgot him and did not love him anymore. He knows exactly what strings to pull with DH. In his newer texts I saw him asking DH to actually give the dog away. And worse was DH saying he would buy another puppy for BM’s house as a compromise.
I was so upset and confronted DH about it. DH now says he regrets ever moving and that he wants to go back. He says he is only ever happy when SS is with us. Apparently spending time with my kids all the time is unfair to SS (These are SS’s words exactly from the texts) Then he says he doesn’t even like the dog anymore. I feel very betrayed. We discussed long and hard before the move. Moving back is just not an option for me. I was treated very poorly in my last job. And there aren’t other places where I can work (I am a teacher).
We have no issues with BM and SS is generally a great kid in school with lots of friends and good grades. But when he is with us he is a complete monster. And my own kids are sensing the change in attitude in DH towards them.
What do I do to help DH see the light!!
3 weekends a month is crap
3 weekends a month is crap when you're used to having 50/50. Why should this guy be happy with 3 weeks a month with his kid when he has his stepkids full time? Really, how many stepmoms here would be happy with that arrangement? :sick:
The only "winners" in this move were the OP and her kids. I'm amazed that he actually agreed to the move.
The SS is being an ass, but his feelings are valid.
I agree with you.. There is
I agree with you.. There is way to much catering to this kid and the outcome is not going to be good for either party. It sucks for BOTH sets of kids.. SS lost time with his Dad and stepkids are losing any kind of bond they did have established with him due to SS's jealousy and need to control the household.
Life isn't fair and this kid needs to learn that. They made a decision AS A FAMILY to move as it would benefit them at the time. At 8 months everyone is settled into their new community and schools by now. I don't get how SS gets to benefit from his Mother, Dad, AND Stepdad apparently but OP's kids aren't allowed to have any relationship with their Stepdad. It seems both kids are in the same situation, Father's live farther away. Kids stay with Mothers and spend a lot of time with their Stepdad's.
My children's father works on the oil rigs and is gone for a month at a time. His schedule can change anytime. My kids deal with it because that's how it is and he needs a job. I'm a SAHM. If I were to go get a job tomorrow my kids would also have adapt and adjust to me not being available to them as often.. I'd be damned if I let a young child dictate and rule my household and demand I severe ties with other children in the home or other people in general.
I'm not saying to not
I'm not saying to not acknowledge his feelings and get him some help or whatever but he cannot expect everyone else to bend to his every whim. Dad can't play with the dog, can't interact with other kids, what's he going to say next? Dad can't kiss or have sex with his own wife because that's attention away from him? There has to be boundaries and he's just acting like a brat. I'm sure he IS hurt and understand that but everyone has to deal with less than ideal situations in life when they come around. Babying and coddling him is doing NO ONE any good, especially not him. Let him try that crap at school or a job when he is an adult if his Daddy continues to let him get away with it at home..
Thanks for understanding my
Thanks for understanding my concerns anotherstep2.
Both of us got new jobs to move here. My kids transferred schools. I was being bullied in my previous workplace. It's a small town so it's not like I can go back there. It was awful for me.
And DH knew exactly what we were getting into. I was actually contemplating quitting completely before he suggested the school in this town.
He knew he would see SS less frequently. But the extra money I would make would benefit all of us. So it's unfair for him to expect us to drop everything for a second time and move here.
I never once said that. I let
I never once said that. I let DH and SS spend all their time together alone. I don't interfere.
And SS calls me "mom" 70% of the time. And we know he calls his stepdad "Dad". Why is there a double standard for my kids?
My issue is how grumpy and distant he has become when SS isn't here. Why punish my kids when they have had a great relationship so far?
And I really dislike how he has been catering to SS. SS is just acting more spoilt because of it.
"Why punish my kids when they
"Why punish my kids when they have had a great relationship so far?"
Disengaging isn't punishing. Your kids have a father. Your husband is free to do as much or as little as he pleases with your kids. There's nothing wrong with him putting his son's feelings ahead of your kids' feelings.
Your kids are just his stepkids. They are not more deserving of his time than his own son is.
We all make mistakes in life. Your husband may just be coming to terms with the fact that this move was a mistake for him and his son.
The guy getting along with
The guy getting along with his SKs isn't the problem. The problem is that he decreased the amount of time he was spending with his bio son. The SKs are benefiting from that change. That change is hurting his son. Now he's stepping back and trying to find a solution to the problem.
"Hey, if OP's ex is disturbed
"Hey, if OP's ex is disturbed by being so far from his children, nothing is preventing him from moving closer to them. BOOM."
Or the OP could have her kids go live with their dad full time and visit her 3 weeks during the summer. (OP I'm kidding)
Their bio dad is out of
Their bio dad is out of state, but their "bonus" dad is there 100% of the time.
Why do you keep bring up the military?? That has nothing to do with this. The dad in this situation had the ideal custody arrangement. It worked for everyone involved until the OP starting having issues at her job. Now the SS and dad should just suck it up and be happy with 3 weeks a month because most men are stuck with that crappy schedule?
When did stepkids start mattering more than bio kids? :?
There must be some benefit.
There must be some benefit. If not, they nor the OP would be upset about him pulling back.
I read all the time here about BMs trying to push bio dads out of the picture and replace them with their new SOs/husbands. The fact that this kid has a stepfather (that he calls dad) and is hurt about the lack time with his bio dad speaks volumes. His stepfather isn't a replacement for his bio dad.
Tommar if your children came
Tommar if your children came first why did you get divorced?
You got divorced because YOU came first.
I find that most people only
I find that most people only think it is okay to be away from your kids for work IF you are still married to their mother. If you aren't still married to the mom you are by no means allowed to move away from child to have a job.
Very true. We moved further
Very true. We moved further away from my husband's daughter about a year ago because it was the best thing for our family overall (for our jobs and for our DD). BM threw a fit even though it had no impact on how often SD visits. But when she and DH were together, she didn't care that he was on the road for work constantly and rarely saw SD as it was.
But he didn't move away for a
But he didn't move away for a job. :? He had a job. Everything was fine until the OP started having problems at her job.
What Fruit said 110%
What Fruit said 110%
^You make a good point here.
^You make a good point here.
No, BM would not allow that
No, BM would not allow that unfortunately. It was difficult enough getting her to agree to the third weekend.
We asked SS if he wanted to move with us at the time but he did not want to change schools.
OP, did you guys think about
OP, did you guys think about commuting? Was living half way between SS town and the town you teach in an option? That way dad could maintain his 50/50 and you would be able to work in different school system.
Unfortunately no. Its just
Unfortunately no. Its just emptiness between the two towns (except farms).
It was either me having a 3 hour commute everyday or moving. And at that point, the gas itself would have made my raise pointless.
We thought at the time everyone would adjust. And even DH thought it would be a good way to expand his skillset. Of course now we see that it wasn't the best decision.
Kids are still angry when
Kids are still angry when their parents live together. Geez, life isn't fair.
Agree as well.^^^ SS is not
Agree as well.^^^
SS is not coping well with the move, dad is not dealing well with this son's resulting bratty behavior. They need an impartial professional to help navigate through this.
The OP tells us her SS12
The OP tells us her SS12 demands, compares gifts and pouts, yells and cries, tantrums, ignores, and fights with and is mean to his stepsibs. He's TWELVE, not seven. He's being a brat.
I agree that he's hurting,
I agree that he's hurting, but he's also behaving inappropriately towards others and using manipulation to control and get what he wants. The former doesn't justify the latter. That's why he and the father should be in therapy. The boy needs help.to develop health coping strategies, and the father needs help working through this with his son.
I'm kind of on the fence with
I'm kind of on the fence with this issue.
I was leaning towards siding with the SS, but then Anotherstep2 made this point:
"....not interacting with the other kids and the dog when the son is not there is not going to help anyone........dictating what the father can and can not do in his absence is going to give him a very outsized sense of power and entitlement. He can not expect his father to just sit like a toy on a shelf waiting for the weekends when they are together."
I guess one thing I'm thinking is, if the OP's husband had come here and posted this from his perspective, don't you think we would have criticized him for severing the relationship he had with his step kids?
Also, would any of us let our step kids dictate how we (including our bio kids and husbands) spend our time when they're not at our houses?
It's easy to say that you
It's easy to say that you would never move away from where your kids live, but there are so many things that factor into a decision like that.
Tommar, you have no idea what
Tommar, you have no idea what I would do if I were put in a situation where I would have to consider moving away from my children. Like I said, it's easy to say "No, I wouldn't move away from my kids." But I honestly can't say what I would do if I had to make a decision like that. So many potential things could factor into it. I don't have a crystal ball to see what exactly the circumstances would be for me to be faced with that decision.
Again, I'm not sure why
Again, I'm not sure why you're telling someone online who you've never met what they would or wouldn't do. You don't know me. I could very well be faced with circumstances at some point down the road that would require me to move away from my kids. Would I want that to happen? Absolutely not. All I'm saying is that I can't predict for certain that I will never have to live away from my kids.
A 1.5 hour commute is NOT a
A 1.5 hour commute is NOT a survival issue. Thousands of people do that every freakin' day. Buses, subways, trains, cars --- so many people have complicated commutes. It not a big deal.
There are also SMs here who
There are also SMs here who stay in awful marriages because they don't want to be away from their children.
There are SMs here who are full time SMs because BM made the choice to leave the kids with dad. Those moms are always vilified.
There are circumstances where
There are circumstances where a parent may have to move, even if it's temporary. How the hel1 are (mainly) fathers supposed to pay the hefty child support/alimony/medical bills assigned to them if they are laid off or unemployed? Pay up and maybe have to move or be a dead beat; what a choice!
Sometimes the rug gets pulled out from under you. It sucks, I've had it happen and it can happen to anyone. Add multiple marriages, skids, ex spouses and lots of opposing forces in the mix and it may be nearly impossible to stay in the same town as your kid.
I do not judge parents who have to be separate from their children, they judge themselves enough. No need for anyone to heap more shame on them.
how often do you see your
how often do you see your friends that you think 3 whole weekends a Month isn't enough to keep those relationships solid? Maybe it's because we moved so often when I was a kid, but I can't imagine spending that much time with anyone other than DH and my kids. If I see a friend one day for a few hours - dinner or whatever - every other week or once a month, we're doing just fine. If we see each other once a month or once a year depending on the friend, that can be plenty. There is Skype, there are phones. I don't know of any club that expects 3 weekends, three full sets of 48 hours a month to keep going. Most clubs I know of will maybe meet once a month, possibly once a week.
People move because of work, because one usually can't expect to stay gainfully employed working only 3 weekends a month. Bills have to be paid and kids have to be paid for. Sometimes that changes the amount of time families can all spend together. The type of work one signs up for changes the amount of time families have together. Long distance truckers, oilfield workers, jobs I can't even imagine. DH can be required to travel up to 75% of the time for his job. It's not the norm for us, but after DD2 was born, yeah, he was gone most of the time the first 11 months. DH's best friend is probably gone 80% of the time and he and his wife don't seem to have any problem with their relationship and their "most weekends" arrangement. We have a friend that is an overseas contractor. Guy is in the Middle East for 11 months of the year. He's got 4 kids, they're married, they seem fine.
There is no one right way for a family to operate. Saying that one way of doing something is wrong because it's not what you would sign up for is the same as telling someone else their religion is wrong or their relationship is wrong because you don't like their spouse or their holy book.
Your arguments could be used for 50/50 custody too. What wife would want to sign up for only seeing her husband every other week? What job would keep you for only every other week? If you want full time with both parents, then don't split up. Otherwise, everyone has to make sacrifices and adjust. Kids pretty much never want their parents to split, but much like moving for work, it's not the kids choice.
I'm sure everyone would rather things were different in this situation. But they both made the decision to move. And he can of course choose to leave and move back. I get his kid is upset, I understand the anger. I do not understand him allowing his child to dictate what he can or can not do when the child is not there. It's ridiculous. And thinking all things in life should remain the same because there are kids involved is not realistic. Businesses close, budgets change, needs of a family change. Divorce makes everything more complicated and most of the circumstances aren't exactly signed up for by anyone.
Yes the SS is hurt and angry.
Yes the SS is hurt and angry. But the best way to deal with that is NOT by agreeing to every ridiculous demand that he makes. At 13 he needs to learn coping skills to deal with circumstances that are not always going to be perfect for him.
Life is going to deal him less than ideal situations to deal with. He should learn how to adjust - not just expect to be able to dictate how everyone else must act.
I've seen many, many, many COD deal with long-distance relationships with one of their parents. And no it is not always the NCP moving away. Just as often it is the CP who wants to move across country for valid reasons and the NCP perhaps reluctantly agrees. And by long distance I mean thousands of miles not a few hours away.
My nephew was barely 6 when his mother moved him thousands of miles away (so she could be near her family). He and his father are extremely close. His mother was a great mother. but he would be the first to credit his father also for how he turned out. He's now in his early 30s and is not only well educated and professionally successful - he's a kind and caring individual.
In real life people move across country maybe multiple times. Sometimes divorced parents do not live near each other. That's reality. And the CODs that I've seen deal with this have not been permanently damaged.
^What she said. SS is going
^What she said.
SS is going to have a hard time in the world if he thinks everyone will cater to his demands just like daddy does.
I've seen this type of behavior in ss30, he's lost job after job, and relationship after relationship because he's used to being coddled and catered to.
Goldie, a lot of the people
Goldie, a lot of the people on here that have no empathy for your kids will turn around and tell you later how horrible your kids are once they get tired of your DH's bs distance from them and disengage too - and it won't be pretty for DH.
You guys need therapy. Period.
Yes, SS is hurting, but your DH isn't handling it in a mature manner. He's letting his emotions react without thought. It's not ok his son feels the way he does and it's ALSO not ok how he's making your kids feel out of his guilt.
Hi Goldie, Didn't read all
Hi Goldie,
Didn't read all the comments, but I see 3 separate issues here:
1. Your DH is unhappy with the move. Even though he agreed to it, it made him unhappy. You need to accept his feelings. This needs to be addressed separately from everything else. You guys need to talk together, as a couple about eachother's goals, and whether or not you can continue to move in the same direction together.
2. Although it may be natural for SS to feel jealous, I don't think it's good parenting to cater to the jealousy. I mean, DH is not only telling his SS that it's ok to be jealous, but he's actually letting a child's jealousy regulate his grownup behavior... just to appease him. Not a good lesson for SS to learn.
( note: In our house, what we do when either set of kids is away with their other parents is none of their business. We teach our kids to figure out what their business is and focus on that. It's a great life skill.)
3. I'm sorry your children are not getting much sympathy here. They accepted your DH and opened their hearts to him, and now he's pulling back when they've done nothing wrong. I do think DH needs to mend his relationsihip with his son, but I don't see why that means pulling away from anyone else. We all try to teach our kids that there's enough love in their hearts to include everyone... I'm sure there's enough love in DH's heart to include your kids.
So, I think a dose of maturity is needed here.
For you: What do you want? What's more important to you, this man or this job? Can you try to look at him from a place of compassion?
For DH: Ok, his kid is jealous... so how does he teach him to deal with this emotion in a positive way instead of a destructive way? Does he want this kid to grow up to be a jealous husband who acts like a lunatic just to get his way? Or does he want to teach him how to realize he can feel jealous and control it responsibly?
Perhaps some counseling would help... sometimes getting an unbiased 3rd opinion helps (but make sure the counselor is not a moron... go yourself for a private session first and ask questions to figure this out before you go in with DH).
My two cents, hope they help.
(No subject)
There are a lot of comments
There are a lot of comments but I thought I would respond to LikeMinded and answer everybody's advice and questions as well. Her post resonated with me the most.
I do no want DH to replace my kids' father. They love their own father more than DH for sure, just like most other children. However, they do care for DH and respect him and enjoy his company. Isn't that what most steps should be like? I thought I was really lucky my kids warmed up to DH so quick. But I guess some of you have a problem with that? I couldn't understand some people's problem with this actually. SS has a great relationship with his stepdad and even calls him "Dad". Why should my kids not do the same?
Someone suggested living apart. I am sure there are people out there who can afford support two separate households but we are not one of them. DH either stays here or we all move.
Here is my problem with moving back. Both DH and I quit our old jobs and got new ones in this town. Both my kids changed schools for this move. And after months of tears, DD has finally settled in here. It took us 8 months and we have just settled down. We sold our old house for barely $500 profit. We bought another house here before we moved. Considering moving costs, lawyer fees and the current market, selling our house again would put us in the red. Again, we are not rich people.
Also, I hated my job in my old school. It was the only school where I can actually work. The workplace environment was so hostile towards the younger teachers that some of us would cry right in our offices. I cannot put myself through that again. Believe me, if it were not for these issues, I would be heading back no questions asked. But there are many factors involved here.
DH and I spent months making this decision to move. We involved SS from the very beginning. He seemed understanding at first. And we even offered for him to move with us but he declined. After we moved I guess SS started feeling the way he did.
I do not get how some people are excusing SS's behavior. I understand he feels bad, truly. But that doesn't mean he gets to be mean to me and his stepsiblings.
He is old enough to know he is hurting our feelings. Would the same posters be ok with him telling DH not to love me when he isn't there? How is that fair?
And i just wanted to say this. DH picks him up every Friday straight after school and drops him back at school Monday Morning. That is almost three full days of time with DH. And this happens for three weekends a month. On top of this, DH makes the 3 hour roundtrip 1-2 times a month on a weekday to attend SS's games and have dinner after. And I never interfere with DH and SS's time together. How much more can he give? DH spends more time with SS now then he ever did when we had 50% custody. I used to be with SS on weekdays back then mostly.
Some of you are making me feel like a bad person when I didn't even do anything. DH and I made this decision together. If he had ever objected, I would not have pushed to move.
My biggest problem now is DH completely catering to SS when he never used to before (not to this extent anyway). Of course it is creating a rift in our lives. SS comes here and just feels like he has a right to everything in the house, even my kids' things. He won't listen to me and talks back to DH. You should have seen how he behaved during Christmas, over a 10 dollar soccer ball. Let's not forget he gets a lot of presents from his grandparents and mother too. That is bratty behavior and I stand by my words.
And some people are ok with him ordering DH on who to love and what to do? Give me a effing break. That is just disrespectful. And I understand DH is the bigger problem in this for allowing SS to control him like this. He needs to help SS cope with his emotions better as LikeMinded and others have said.
I think like many suggested, counseling as a family is our best bet. Or maybe for just DH and SS. Whatever is most appropriate.
I struggle with this. He made
I struggle with this. He made a commitment to his step children and now will turn his back for a selfish twit who is probably enjoying the drama and has another home....
Bhub bye, nobody "puts my baby in the corner" should be your response especially if the twit is not there. Some bad lessons there that could affect your kids self-esteem for the rest of their lives.
Actually, I pay all utilities
Actually, I pay all utilities and groceries for my household here. DH pays for half the mortgage, SS's and his cell, and his car costs. He also needs to save a lot for SS's college because of the divorce decree conditions.
The main reason we moved was because I would be able to save a few hundred extra for my own kids. And DH would no longer need to pay for half the utilities. This would also free up DH to put more into SS's college fund.
Both DH and I put the same amount into our retirement. All of my ex's CS goes into college savings and/or luxuries for my kids.
So I can support myself thank you very much. We even got a house that had four bedrooms so that SS could have his own room here.
However, Dh will not be able to make the retirement contributions, half of the mortgage here, save for college AND pay for another apartment in SS's town.
So I help feed SS and DH pays nothing towards my kids. Hope that helps clear up your concerns.
It's usually recommended for
It's usually recommended for SMs to disengage when their husbands won't let them parent his kids or when the step kids don't have a good relationship with the SM. Neither of those things are happening in the OP's case. Her husband has a good relationship with her kids and she lets him parent them. The only reason for disengagement is because his son wants him to. Why let a teenager have that much power?
Either way, it is still not
Either way, it is still not even close to the kind of situations SMs are in when disengagement is recommended. Everything was fine between the OP's kids and her husband until his son got upset about it.
Of course the step parent can
Of course the step parent can decide how much they want to be involved with their step kids. But I can understand the OP's frustration with her husband given his reason for taking a step back from her kids.
When I disengaged from my SD, my husband knew exactly why I was doing it and my reason was justifiable - he wouldn't let me parent her (make rules, enforce rules, etc.) but he expected me to cook for her, clean up after her, spend money on her, etc. Things were not rosy prior to my disengagement - my husband could've changed his behaviour to get me to stay involved in SD's life.
But in the OP's case, the relationship between her husband and her kids was great and she let him parent them how he wanted to. His disengagement was abrupt and not for the usual reasons that step parents disengage. I can understand why it's having a negative effect on the OP and her kids, especially since they weren't doing anything wrong for her husband to decide to disengage.
I might have assumed she was
I might have assumed she was allowing him to parent them based on how involved he was with them. Maybe we don't quite know the whole story though.
And yeah, my point is just that I can see why this is hard for the OP and her kids. When I disengaged from my SD, my husband could have prevented it by just letting me parent her. But it doesn't sound like the OP could have changed anything to get her husband to stay involved in her kids' lives. It's a tough situation for everyone in this family.
What about SMs who had great
What about SMs who had great relationships with their SKs prior to having children of their own? No one has ever said those SMs were wrong for backing off. A husband dare not complain about it. Heaven help the SK that express hurt feelings because SM's feeling have changed.
The great thing about being a step parent is that you're free to be as involved as you want to be.
Well, I'm glad someone is
Well, I'm glad someone is finally sticking up for the dogdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb542/eb542f4cece265eda8d89e6a9fe41da9ebcc43f1" alt="Blum 3"
Skid is dictating how DH acts
Skid is dictating how DH acts when he's not living under the same roof and he's only 13; it won't magically change when he turns 18. Lots of adult skids who still try to control daddee. DH needs to nip this now or he will end up losing everything, including skid, because kids who are enabled like this do very poorly in life.
Although this has been an
Although this has been an interesting read, I think Luvmypuppy kind of touched on what I have to add, Goldie. We can say SS is being a brat, we can say DH is being immature, blah blah blah, bottom line is this: your DH, in his actions and words, is showing you his son is more important to him than you and your two kids. That's what you're dealing with, and what you will be dealing with moving forward. And I have no magic workaround for it, and neither does anyone else. Best of luck.
No, HRNYC. I'm saying that
No, HRNYC.
I'm saying that after 200 some odd comments, when you get down to the brass tacks of it, her DH is putting his son before her, and certainly before her children. That is her reality, and no amount of dissecting the situation is going to change it. I would say, for me, there's no way in hell I would move away from my 13 year old kid. I would just make it work somehow where I was at. That's just me though.
Facts: 1. SS is hurting. He
Facts:
1. SS is hurting. He and DH need to get into counselling.
2. SS is being a brat. He needs to understand that his demands of his father are absurd and ridiculous in light of his pain. Therapy should focus on effective coping skills.
3. DH is confused. He needs to understand that he can have many relationships with whomever he chooses and that it does not lessen the one he has with his son.
4. Goldie is not to solely blame for this. It was a family decision, including giving the option to SS to come along with the move. Why are people ripping her apart and throwing in her face that she is the winner in this situation? What more could she have done, really? You're implying that she had negative intentions the way some of you are treating her. I don't believe her intentions were negative at all.
5. I would actually calculate, with the three weekends a month, long weekends, holidays, school holidays, weeknights, etc...., how many days that DH will still see SS in comparison to before? I'm not sure if I read about summer visitation here, but if DH gets summers and holidays, I can't imagine that the difference is too large. If the difference in time spent before to now is not significantly different, DH may want to show SS this.
Why not attack the kids? SKs
Why not attack the kids? SKs are attacked here day in and day out. :?
If a husband's kids were hurt because SM pulled back, those kids would be called brats, spoiled, entitled, whore.... SKs are attacked here all the time for doing normal kid stuff. why should the rules change when the SKs are the SM's bio kids?
And for the record, I'm not in favor of attacking ANY kids.
Hmm.....seems everyone has
Hmm.....seems everyone has their panties in a wad over this one. The OP has even lost interest but the squabbling continues.
It seems to be "the usuals", here to defend the step child in the story. For some, I suppose, step children deserve everything they want.
Having VALID FEELINGS still
Having VALID FEELINGS still does not excuse one from being a f*cking brat.
Many of us (even as children) have had VALID FEELINGS - but that still does not enable one to dictate stupid, sh*tty demands to others.
The SS is jealous and angry over his father spending less time with him and more with his SKs. How the f*ck does the DH not playing with the dog when the SS is not there help anything?
HRNYC, it's easy for you to
HRNYC, it's easy for you to tell someone else to simply drive 1.5 hours to get to work every day, isn't it? I used to commute for 1 hour each way and that became too much after doing it for only a year, so we moved *gasp* further away from SD so that I could be closer to my job because it was best for our family overall. You have no idea how that commute would have affected the OP's kids or the family in general. They most likely considered this option before moving and decided against it.
I agree with Danielle. She made some great points. Three weekends a month is more than most NCP fathers get to see their kids. My husband currently sees SD once every three weeks IF BM feels like accommodating his current work schedule. If she feels like being a bitch, he only sees SD once every six weeks.