You are here

Gearing up for crazy time -- very long, but I used paragraphs

LuluOnce's picture

Been a while since I've blogged about anything because while things haven't been at all perfect (are they ever with a GUBM?) they were status quo and I was managing. But, it's BM's crazy season and the drama is starting. 

Per the latest CO, BM is to attend reunification therapy with my SDs (ages 8 and 13) to address a lot of the things she did and said during her last psychotic episode, which started last August and, according to the documents submitted to court by her psychiatrist, ended in February. The episode was really bad and resulted in BM losing all custody and having supervised visitation until she completes a number of "milestones". Some of the quicker ones to list ones are: 1) continue regular psychiatric treatment and provide reports of visits to DH and social worker; 2) continue ongoing appointments with psychologist to increase coping skills and better handle stress; 3) take blood test twice a year to prove she is taking her medication and submit results to DH and social worker; and 4) attend reunification therapy with SDs. But there are eight total action items that BM is supposed to do.

This version of the CO was established in late May and so far the only thing BM has done is start to attempt reunification therapy. Which is what I'm here to vent about. 

Reunification therapy has turned into the biggest flipping joke. I don't know how BM does it. I really don't. She convinces everyone that she is "doing everything she can!" and DH is interfering with her relationship with her "baaaayyyyybeeees". (Kinda like the GUBM version of "daaaaadeeee" I guess? lol) 

Anyway, BM has been working towards reunification since June. The CO'd therapist gave BM a list of questions she had to answer in a letter before BM and SDs can actually be in a session together. It's taken BM 4+ months to answer the questions but per the CO'd therapist, she is "almost done with that letter" now and is ready to begin reunification therapy, but only with OSD13. 

This CO'd therapist, has seen both skids three or four times without BM present. There are like, 4 or 5 other therapists and mental health professionals involved at this point, but let's just focus on this particular CO'd therapist who called DH last week and wanted to meet with him. DH agreed. And wouldn't you know it? The entire session is just the therapist accusing DH of things BM says he's doing that DH either isn't doing or that DH is doing BECAUSE IT'S WRITTEN IN THE CO!!

He spent the whole hour refuting BM's lies. BM says he keeps her from seeing the girls regularly. Nope. BM is only allowed supervised visits (until she completes the above) and refuses to have anyone but GBM supervise them. Since GBM lives hours away and has an elderly husband at home, she comes up only for a few weeks at a time and leaves for a few weeks at a time. When she is gone, BM refuses to get another supervisor. Therefore she cannot see the kids. This is not DH keeping her from seeing the kids. This is her being an entitled dumba** who doesn't think the rules apply to her. BM says DH won't let her attend OSD's softball events. Umm, OSD is NOT IN SOFTBALL! She is in basketball. And the sport hasn't even started yet. He also sent her the links to the websites that list all of the schedules/events for the sports OSD13 will be doing this year during is monthly email update about the kids' activities which he is required by the CO to send, so she already has that information. BM says he won't take her calls so she can talk to the kids. Also no. In order for DH to refuse BM's calls -- which he has never, ever done -- BM would actually HAVE TO CALL. She doesn't call! Once every 10 days she calls, maybe. But she's told the CO'd therapist  how hard she's trying to stay in touch with her baaayyyybeees and mean DH just won't let her.

The whole visit was like this. And even better! It ended with the CO'd therapist saying that BM needs to have more time with the kids, despite the fact that she has not completed treatment or even had a single reunification therapy session.

This pisses me off in an of itself, because I seriously get so tired of everyone falling for her act and blaming DH for everything that's wrong. I know she presents well, she looks beautiful and cries at all the right times but she must have the charisma of a cult leader to get people to buy what she's selling. Especially in situations like this, when the therapist has the full case file that lists all the very unsafe things she did and mentions the restraining order she got for threatening to kill people. So yes, this pisses me off because it seems so unfair. But I can deal. 

What has completely sent me over the edge is this: yesterday, DH gets an email from the CO'd therapist asking him to do all kinds of stuff for BM: requesting that DH give BM 3-4 weekends in a row of visitation (then 2 weekends off visitation, repeating) because "it's more convenient for BM and GBM", requesting that DH send the dates and locations for all the softball events "with instructions on how to get there and where to park" and requesting that DH ask his personal friends and family to supervise the visits "since BM doesn't have anyone besides her mother", and can't afford professional supervision (despite the fact that BM gets over $4300 a month through alimony and her part time job).

What the actual f***? Is this for real?

GBM sent a follow up email shortly thereafter. Some key points that thrill me: GBM has been chosen by God to help her daughter through this trying time and though it's a heavy cross to bear, she will do so because she was meant to be a mother, and she is a good mother just like BM is. Also it's a shame that BM has had so many falling outs with her female friends, but BM has always had trouble keeping female friends ever since she was a little girl because other females have always been jealous of her. Because of this jealousy, BM has no female friends to ask to supervise visits when GBM is away. If only DH would re-consider letting the ex-boyfriend supervise visits! It would be good for BM and allow the kids to get to know this "godly man" who is so important in BM's life (so I guess BM and the ex are back together for the 3468th time?) because BM really has no one else and simply can't afford to pay a supervisor (again, she gets/earn a combined minimum of $4300 a months, and before the last court date confessed to DH that she wasn't even paying the last supervisor and owed over $1200 for her visits between Jan and Apr). Also could DH just agree to the new schedule the CO'd therapist is asking for because it would really be so much more convenient for her (GBM)? And my absolute favorite WTAF moment? GBM sent the email with a handful of photos of herself attached, showing her engaged in a variety of charity and volunteer events. LOL.

There are so many things wrong with this picture... what is wrong with these people? This is so bizarre to me!!

First, no. We are following the CO. BM should do the same. When she wants to submit all the necessary info showing she's getting individual treatment, taking her meds, and she and the girls have actually completed reunification therapy, THEN they can discuss changing the visitation schedule. But since not a single one of these things has happened? Nope. Not changing a thing.

Second, BM has not asked for a single one of these things herself. In fact, in the last two months, BM has had direct communication with DH only two times, and both were in the last week. The first time was to criticize DH's parenting, since OSD said something to YSD that BM didn't approve of during one of the visits. (Because she's an expert at parenting, ya know?) The second time she asked that visitation be moved from 10am-3pm to 4pm-10pm "so that the girls could sleep in on Saturday morning". DH said no, as YSD8 is in bed by 8pm every night. BM then accused him of lying about the kids having bedtimes.

That's it. All other communication about dates and schedules has gone through GBM. And now, apparently the CO'd therapist wants to get involved in scheduling visits too? No. Just no. It seriously makes us question her mental health right now, since this is her traditional "trigger" time of year. Asking for a visit with an 8 year old that lasts until 10pm? Being unable to click a link to read a sport's schedule? Remembering what sport you child actually plays? (Although I am willing to possibly give a pass to this, if it's the therapist who got it wrong. But, at the same time, BM doesn't even remember the name of YSD's school so... who knows?) If she is making weird schedule requests and unable to do some very basic parenting/ adulting functions, then perhaps she's not all that well and maybe less time is what's in order. 

DH hasn't replied yet but is going to form a polite but firm version of "appreciate how much everyone cares, but it's best if BM and I work together on these things and so communication be directly between us moving forward" and then when (if?) BM contacts him and restates all these things, he'll say the respectful and court appropriate version of "Gee, I'd be happy to make some changes... right after you comply with your portion of the CO". 

TL;DR How does BM continue to convince everyone she is the victim in this? Why is no one able to understand that she is legitimately mentally ill and mental illness isn't a cold? It doesn't just "run its course" and then you wake up one day fully recovered! Why is DH responsible for every single thing including making BM's and GBM's lives easier? What the eff is wrong with this therapist who is recommending all kids of stuff before even completing her own portion of the CO? I am so tired of the contact! I am so tired of the stress this puts on DH. Just follow the flippin' CO, BM. Do what you are supposed to and don't have your flying monkeys talk to us until you do!

Comments

STaround's picture

DH should be polite and firm.  I would remind idiot therapist that BM was supposed to do x, y and Z and has not done, and would just say, sorry, no volunteers for supervisor

Harry's picture

A copy of the CO.  Then ask the therapist if,  Is he , the therapist asking him DH to break the law ?   Then he should report the therapist to the proper Athority for him asking DH to be in comment of court .  

Second that would be the last time I would have any interaction with this jerk. (. I mean Therapist)  The bigger question is how an a screw up person help another screw up person. ?   There very few therapist who do any good. The majory just fill there bank account. 

Ispofacto's picture

This.  Have DH ask the therapist if she's willing to assume liability if something were to happen to the skids as a result of BM's non-compliance with her court ordered reunification plan.  Tell the therapist it is her job to hold BM accountable.

Mental health professionals are largely resistant to putting themselves on the hook for negligence, liability, or malpractice.

 

LuluOnce's picture

I thought that, while annoying, the therapist was still within legal reason to request that BM have additional visits and contact, especially since she (the therapist) was very clear that she was still not recommending unsupervised contact? The visits would just be more than what BM and DH "agreed to" in the CO, but they would still be supervised by GBM so it would still be acceptable. Is this not the case in your opinion? Because I hadn't considered it this way...

That said, I don't get the impression the therapist has any desire to hold BM accountable. No one ever believes she's as sick as she is unless they see her in an active episode. Which thankfully the judge did and that's how DH got full custody and the RO. She is sneaky and slippery. The last professional supervisor? They "became friends" and spent time together outside of supervision!! Which is how she was able to go so long without paying the office. I can't explain it. People just fall for her bulls*** left and right!

I asked DH to consider approaching it from the perspective that the therapist seemed to be treating BM as if she was the primary client and the only person whose mental health mattered, when in fact she has two other clients (the skids) whose mental health needs to be considered as well and forcing additional visits BEFORE rebuilding the trust between BM and skids seemed imprudent. 

But also, I'm venting about this here because I am nervous my DH does not have the stomach to challenge the therapist and I am a bit unsettled about his next move. 

Ispofacto's picture

I'm sorry, I'm not an attorney.  It would be best if you asked your lawyer.  But it does sound like the therapist is not holding BM accountable.

I do think it may be in DH's best interest to attempt to appear "flexible" with the supervisor, but if no one wants to do it, the BF doesn't sound qualified.  And the 10pm visit request is absurd.

 

tog redux's picture

When you say it's a "CO'd" therapist, what do you mean?  Was she chosen by the judge?

LuluOnce's picture

The judge didn't say they had to see this specific therapist, but he did give them a fairly tight list of therapists to choose from for reunification therapy. To their credit, BM and DH did work down the list. Most of them required a retainer and charged standard therapy rates (which in our area is $165 per hour) so BM refused them. There were a few who refused DH and BM because of issues in the case and their specific backgrounds. There was one who had lower rates that BM wanted but refused DH due to perceived bias during the intake appointment. This is the one DH and BM ended up agreeing on.

I also usually just call her CO'd therapist as a way to differentiate therapists, because there are a lot of mental health professionals involved in the case. To date, each skid has an individual therapist (psychologists). BM sees an MFT and a psychologist (or was seeing at the time of the last hearing?) and then her regular psychiatrist. And while not relevant at the moment, when the custody case was first open, there was significant contact between the social worker and the mental health professionals (psychiatrists for sure and clinical social workers, I think?) who treated her doing her stays at the hospital during the times she was 5150'd last year. 

 

tog redux's picture

Unfortunately, therapists fall for this kind of BS all the time - but she doesn't have the right to ask DH to change the court order.  He should not go along with it at this point in time, and point out to the therapist that she hasn't met the terms of the judge's orders to get more visitation.

He should speak to the attorney about what his rights are in this matter. BM chose the therapist that fell for her story in the intake - why did DH agree to her if she showed bias right off the bat?

LuluOnce's picture

Sorry, I meant that he refused the one that showed bias at intake. This therapist seemed reasonable(ish) in the beginning but it would seem that she has since fallen for BM's BS. We also found out later that the therapist allows "sliding scale" payments based on income. I'm sure BM said she didn't get any alimony and used her part-time job wages to prove she's "poor" and get it for less or even free. I can't image she would've kept going for the last 4 months if she actually had to pay for the visits.

He plans to address that with the therapist -- that she still has a number of items to address from the last CO. He's also going to express his discomfort (disinterest) in having the reunification therapist act as BM's mouthpiece. Politely. I think she's way overstepping. Her job is to facilitate the relationship between BM and skids since it's been more than a year since BM has asked them even one meaningful question besides "how was school" and she nearly killed them and herself during one of her hallucinations. Her job is not to tell DH how to handle visits, especially prior to reestablishing that bond between BM and skids.

tog redux's picture

If she works in an agency, he can ask for her supervisor and share his concerns. If she's a private practitioner, there's really nothing he can do in that area. It's likely the judge doesn't really know her work, he just knows her name as someone willing to work with families in these situations.

simifan's picture

 

My suggestion would be to ask the therapist to put her recommendations in writing. Then, I would definitely consult your attorney as well as submit it and the court order to her supervisor or the MH association. It is unethical for her to suggest he violate a court order.